Dealing in Fenced Goods and Services
It’s not uncommon for those receiving fabrication drawings to overlook the legitimacy of the products used by service providers. There seems to be a prevailing mindset of indifference, with the attitude being, “As long as the drawings are correct, I’m fine—I’m legally protected, and proving involvement with stolen goods is too challenging.”
Similarly, many fabricators and builders consciously avoid probing into the legitimacy of the software used for services. The fear of inadvertently becoming complicit in any wrongdoing deters them from asking uncomfortable questions. However, this approach presents a couple of significant issues.
- It sets a concerning tone within your own business. If engaging in any form of dealing with stolen goods becomes an accepted part of your company philosophy, you inadvertently create an environment where “dealing in stolen goods is acceptable as long as we avoid problems.” This not only makes your business susceptible but also ingrains a risky culture among your staff.
- Secondly, this approach poses a broader threat to society. By turning a blind eye to the legitimacy of goods and services, you inadvertently contribute to a scenario where bad actors replace good ones.
The moral compass guiding what can be stolen and how far one can go becomes unsettlingly subjective, lacking the high ethical standards needed to foster a thriving and reputable industry.
It’s crucial for businesses to reassess their practices, placing a premium on integrity and ethical conduct to ensure the industry maintains its standards and safeguards against potential harm.
Leave a Reply